Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾È¿Í °æ»çÀÇ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ Á¤¸ð µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø, 3D-CTÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º Æò°¡

Validity of posterior anterior cephalometric and 3D-CT for orbital canting analysis

±èÁø¿í,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁø¿í ( Kim Jin-Wook ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate validity of posterior anterior cephalometric and 3DCT for orbital canting analysis.

Material and Methods : Three trained observers classified two patients group using standardized frontal photographs of facial asymmetry patients. Group A consisted of patients with facial asymmetry and orbital canting(n=19), and group B consisted of patients with only facial asymmetry(n=43). Orbital canting was measured with line of bilateral inferior orbitale. Orbital canting measurement was done with posterior anterior cephalometric and 3D-CT. Each horizontal reference line was established by bilateral GWSO(cephalometric), FZS(3D-CT). Maxillary canting and mandibular deviation angle were also measured and analyzed with orbital canting.

Results: The mean orbital canting was 3.03+/-1.00 degrees in Group A and 1.11+/-0.76 degrees in Group B in frontal photograph. The mean orbital canting was 1.20+/-0.74 degrees in group A and 1.22+/-0.65 degrees in group B by cephalometric analysis(p>0.05). In 3D-CT, orbital canting was almost paralleled with horizontal reference line. The orbital canting, maxillay canting and mandibular deviation between two groups showed no significant differences except madibular deviation in 3D-CT.

Conclusion: Common analysis of posterior anterior cephalometric and 3D-CT is not valide method to evaluate orbital canting for facial asymmetry patients with orbital canting.

Å°¿öµå

Cephalomatric;3D-CT;Orbital canting

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed